|
Thumbnail |
Title |
Category |
Data Source |
Resource |
|
|
Aquatic Priority Area (TN) |
Ecology |
TN Wildlife Resources Agency |
|
|
Abstract:
Displays the aquatic priority area portion of the State Wildlife Action Plan Priority Habitat in Tennessee.
Metadata File
Publication Date: 2005 -
Data last updated: 2011-09-21
|
|
|
Midwest Wind Energy MSHCP GI Network |
Ecology |
The Conservation Fund |
|
|
Abstract:
This layer was created as part of the green infrastructure network design being developed for the Midwest Wind Energy Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Section 6 grant project. As part of The Conservation Fund's (The Fund) Section 6 grant scope of work, The Fund supported the design and coordination of a consistent and effective mitigation approach across USFWS Region 3 in partnership with the States, American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and USFWS. The Fund utilized a green infrastructure approach that will help AWEA and the States integrate species habitat mitigation within the context of an interconnected network of lands and waters, providing multiple benefits across the entire range of AWEA member activities in the eight affected states: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Such an approach will also ensure a consistent methodology is used to determine selection of mitigation projects. The methodology employed in this process has been accepted by the 8 states participating states in the process.
Metadata File
Publication Date: May 2014 -
Data last updated: 2014-08-07
|
|
|
West Virginia Conservation Network |
Ecology |
The Conservation Fund |
|
|
Abstract:
This dataset was developed as part of a Conservation Network design by The Conservation Fund for the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. The Fund utilized a green infrastructure approach that will help WVDNR integrate management of habitat for Species of Greatest Conservation Need within the context of an interconnected network of lands and waters, providing multiple benefits across the state. In order to establish the Network, digital datasets were created that represent core undisturbed habitats for forest, wetland, grassland, and aquatic areas. Corridors connecting forest, wetland, and aquatic areas were delineated to complete the Network.
Metadata File
Publication Date: May 2014 -
Data last updated: 2014-08-07
|
|
|
Green Infrastructure Network Characterization |
Ecology |
The Conservation Fund |
|
|
Abstract:
This layer was developed for the green infrastructure network design being developed for the NiSource MSHCP Section 6 grant project. As part of The Conservation Fund's (the Fund's) Section 6 grant scope of work with the Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife, the Fund supported the design and coordination of a consistent and effective mitigation approach across the NiSource natural gas pipeline transmission system in partnership with the States, NiSource, and USFWS. The Fund is utilizing a green infrastructure approach that will help NiSource and the States integrate species habitat mitigation within the context of an interconnected network of lands and waters, providing multiple benefits across the entire range of NiSource's natural gas pipeline transmission activities. Such an approach will also ensure a consistent methodology is used to determine selection of mitigation. The methodology employed in this process has been accepted by the 14 participating states in the process.
Metadata File
Publication Date: 2010 -
Data last updated: 2012-06-08
|
|
|
Focal Areas of Conservation Significance |
Ecology |
The Nature Conservancy |
|
|
Abstract:
Displays a nuanced picture of the places where conservation is most likely to succeed over centuries. The project had parts: 1) identifying and mapping the geophysical settings, 2) developing a quantitative estimate of resilience for each setting based on landscape complexity and permeability, and 3) identifying key linkages that may be important in facilitating climate-induced regional movements. The final products include the identification of sites with high or low estimated resilience and overlays of these sites with the The Nature Conservancy (TNC) portfolio of important biodiversity sites. The products were presented in an ecoregional context, highlighting sites with the highest estimated resilience for each setting within each ecoregion.
Metadata File
Publication Date: 2012 -
Data last updated: 2012-11-09
|
|
|
Site Wind Right - Wildlife Areas |
Ecology |
The Nature Conservancy |
Wind |
|
Abstract:
This layer is provided by The Nature Conservancy to assist in wind development. By using Site Wind Right early in the process, developers, utilities, power-purchasers and agencies can help save time and money by highlighting areas with the lowest potential for conflict.
Metadata File
Publication Date: July 2019 -
Data last updated: 2019-09-25
|
|
|
Ecoregional Portfolio |
Ecology |
The Nature Conservancy |
|
|
Abstract:
This dataset provides a vision for conservation success for ecosystems, natural communities and species representative of an ecoregion by showing the boundaries of areas that The Nature Conservancy has prioritized for conservation. Many portfolio areas were derived from Ecoregional Assessments, but other priorities derived using other planning methodologies are included in this global dataset.
Metadata File
Publication Date: December 2011 -
Data last updated: 2014-04-03
|
|
|
Southeast Resilience Project |
Ecology |
The Nature Conservancy |
|
|
Abstract:
The Nature Conservancy’s Southeast Resilience Project aimed to identify key places areas for conservation based on land characteristics that increase diversity and resilience. This is the estimated resilience score, based on the combined scores of landscape diversity and local connectedness, and ranked relative to the geophysical setting and ecoregion. The estimated resilience score is given as a SD category based on its standard normalized score for the setting and ecoregion.
Metadata File
Publication Date: March 2014 -
Data last updated: 2014-05-14
|
|
|
Conservation Focus Area (NH) |
Land Status |
The Nature Conservancy |
|
|
Abstract:
Displays the most important areas for protecting significant natural resources within New Hampshire's Coastal Watersheds.
Metadata File
Publication Date: August 2006 -
Data last updated: 2011-09-21
|
|
|
Ecological Cores/Restoration Priorities |
Ecology |
The Wilderness Society |
|
|
Abstract:
This layer displays ecological cores larger than 5,000 acres.
Metadata File
Data last updated: 2013-01-09
|
|
|
Mountain Treasures Area |
Land Status |
The Wilderness Society |
|
|
Abstract:
This layer displays Un-Inventoried Roadless Areas in Southern Appalachian National Forests by the North Carolina–Tennessee border in the Mountain Tresures area.
Metadata File
Publication Date: December 2013 -
Data last updated: 2014-05-14
|
|
|
High Irreplaceability Area |
Ecology |
Two Countries, One Forest |
|
|
Abstract:
This layer displays areas of land that have been assessed for conservation irreplaceability, current threat of human land transformation, and three possible scenarios for the future of land transformation associated with different growth scenarios.
Metadata File
Publication Date: November 2007 -
Data last updated: 2013-01-09
|
|
|
Congressional Districts - 118th Congress |
Boundary |
U.S. Census Bureau |
|
|
Abstract:
Depicts 118th U.S. Congress district boundaries.
Metadata File
Publication Date: January 2023 -
Data last updated: 2024-01-05
|
|
|
Southeastern Ecological Framework Model |
Ecology |
University of Florida - GeoPlan Center |
|
|
Abstract:
This dataset contains the final model results for the Southeastern Ecological Framework (SEF) GIS Decision Support Model.
Metadata File
Publication Date: 2001 -
Data last updated: 2012-06-08
|
|
|
Conserved Land (NH) |
Land Status |
University of New Hampshire - Complex Systems Research Center |
|
|
Abstract:
This layer displays land ownership patterns in the state of New Hampshire.
Metadata File
Publication Date: September 1995 -
Data last updated: 2014-05-14
|